The Actual Bull Case for OpenAI’s Ad Growth
OpenAI is telling investors it will reach 2.75B weekly active users (WAU) by 2030, which is the foundational assumption to reach a projected $100B in ad revenue. This announcement came out after this week’s recording, but it is too big of a headline in tech and AI not to discuss. While we’re bullish on ads and AI, this projection is delusional.
Here's why.
This growth curve has never been done. ChatGPT sits at ~900M WAU today. Hitting 2.75B means 3x'ing in four years. By comparison, Facebook took 13 years to reach 2B monthly users. They also had a powerful social network to expand growth and a social graph that powered a product to pull people back in daily. Google Search took roughly 20 years to become a daily habit for most internet users, and was helped along the way by being the default on Chrome, Android, and Safari. Google’s own AI, Gemini, with every distribution advantage on Earth sits at 750M MAU.
OpenAI is targeting nearly 4x Gemini's MAU, measured weekly, without owning a browser (does Atlas count?), an OS, a social graph, or a default search deal. In short, they don’t have a distribution moat.
And their category isn't even decided yet! Facebook and Google didn't have real competition when they were scaling. OpenAI is fighting multi-front war: Gemini (growing faster MoM than ChatGPT), Microsoft Copilot (embedded in Office and Windows), Claude (up 190% YoY), Meta AI (new model launch), Grok (power of Elon). Every one of them has either better distribution, faster growth, or both.
ChatGPT's own growth has already cooled from 4x YoY to ~6% QoQ heading into 2026. The early adopter wave is captured. The next 1.8 billion users need to be convinced why they should use OpenAI as a weekly habit.
Not all is lost however! OpenAI has a few levers to help achieve this lofty goal. And they need to do it before the category consolidates around someone else. There are really only four plays:
Build a surface — a browser (Again, Atlas anyone…?), a device (Still waiting Jony Ive), or a deeper ad-supported OS-level deal.
Acquire a surface — Meta bought Instagram and WhatsApp for exactly this reason. We’ve made the case that a Snapchat acquisition makes a ton of sense and would instantly add 400M+ daily users in a demo OpenAI doesn't own.
Buy growth — Take a page from TikTok’s playbook and spend $1B+/year on paid acquisition. OpenAI has the balance sheet, but this is an expensive bet.
Default into a partner ecosystem — This needs to be much deeper than the current Apple deal, especially with Gemini able to command greater partnership terms.
Why this matters for advertisers. The $100B ad revenue projection is downstream of the user number. If WAU lands at 1.5B instead of 2.75B (still a generational outcome), the realistic ad ceiling is probably $60-75 billion. Still massive, but a very different story than the one shared. The 2.75B number isn't a forecast, it’s a startup’s forcing function to reorient priorities towards ads and a telegraphing of exactly what OpenAI intends to do over the next 4 years.
Will OpenAI hit $100B by 2030?
Scale Your IRL Campaigns Like Digital Ads
Out Of Home advertising has long been effective but hard to scale—until now. AdQuick makes it simple to plan, deploy, and measure campaigns with the same efficiency and insight you expect from online marketing tools.
Marketers agree: OOH is powerful for brand growth, driving new customers, and reinforcing messaging. AdQuick makes it easy, intuitive, and data-driven—so you can treat real-world campaigns like any other digital channel.
POSTS FROM THE EPISODE
STAY CONNECTED
JAMES BOROW
Twitter – /jamesborow
LinkedIn — /jamesborow
DANIEL DRUGER
Instagram — /danieldruger
TikTok — /danieldruger
LinkedIn — /danieldruger
👉 Hit Subscribe, then leave a ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ review on Spotify & Apple Podcasts. It takes 10 seconds and makes all the difference in helping other people discover ADSN.















